Editors note: Part 1 of ESPNs future of sports betting series focused on the paths to legalization in the United States and what the resulting marketplace could look like. Wholesale Washington Redskins Jerseys . Part 2 looked at future bettors -- humans and robots. Part 3 focuses on the pitfalls, or what could go wrong if sports betting is legalized.When Dr. Christopher Hunt first began working at the University of Sydney Gambling Treatment Clinic in Australia, he recalls seeing one or two troubled sports bettors every six months.Today, after what he calls the gamblization of sports in Australia, Hunt says sports bettors make up one-third of the clinics patients.If sports betting is legalized, will the United States be headed for a future with increased addiction potentially spurned by a rampant barrage of gambling advertising? Proponents point to the expected economic benefits and increased game-integrity protection of legalization. Opponents say those perceived pluses wont outweigh the pitfalls.For the two-thirds-plus of Americans who rarely or never engage in commercial gambling, the change will be negative, said Michael K. Fagan, a former federal prosecutor and current adjunct professor at Washington University School of Law. Anyone fairly and comprehensively evaluating the unbiased, independent academic, health-care and economic evidence readily finds that it weighs in favor of continuing prohibitions on commercial sports gambling.Australia, a country which legalized sports betting around the turn of the century, is a prime example of what America wants to avoid.Widespread legalization of online sports betting arrived in Australia in 2001, but even in a culture with a longtime acceptance of gambling as a form of entertainment, it didnt explode onto the market. In the beginning, mom-and-pop bookmakers competed against the government-owned sportsbook TAB. Teams entered standard sponsorship deals with betting operators, and sports commentators casually began referencing odds during broadcasts. Overall, though, the impact of legalization was minimal and sports betting was looked at as a niche product with niche problems. But trouble loomed.Around 2009, Australians began to notice a dramatic shift in the atmosphere surrounding sports and how the games were presented by the media. International bookmaking companies, with much larger marketing budgets, began arriving on the scene. Soon, advertising for betting could be found near schools and on public transportation. The gambling talk during game broadcasts went from subtle to constant, with commercials from sportsbooks bleeding into the media coverage. At one point, one of Australias biggest bookies was a regular in the broadcast booth.All of a sudden, it was like you couldnt talk about sports without making reference to what the odds were, what the prices were, whether they thought this bet was value or this bet was value, said Hunt, a clinical psychologist. It was what we came to call the gamblization of sport.In 2014 and 2015, Aussies bet $7.1 billion and lost nearly $815 million on sports, according to the recently released 32nd edition of Australian Gambling Statistics. Both figures are records and sharp spikes from the previous year. The data mirrors the increase of sports bettors seeking help for gambling addiction.Advertising is at the heart of the debate in Australia. According to gambling researcher Dr. Sally Gainsbury, the Australian market became so flooded with gambling advertising in recent years that consumers began complaining.?It was similar to what you were seeing [in the U.S.] with the [daily] fantasy advertising, Gainsbury said. Sports events are just now completely dominated by sports betting advertising. All throughout the sporting events youre seeing these complete bombardments of advertising for betting. And community members are now saying, Hey, my kids are watching this. Gambling was supposed to be put be off to the corner and now its front and center.The United Kingdom, home to one of the most mature legal sports betting markets in the world, took steps over the past decade to combat socially irresponsible gambling advertising. Betting and gaming companies in the U.K. have been permitted to advertise across all media since 2007, under strict guidelines monitored by the Advertising Standards Authority. The regulations require that advertisements for gambling must not portray, condone or encourage behaviour that is socially irresponsible or could lead to financial, social or emotional harm. Ads likely to appeal to anyone under 18 or that link gambling to seduction, sexual success or enhanced attractiveness also are prohibited.Aussie politicians and regulators are pushing for federal reform to restrict sports betting advertising. But bookmakers counter that if the rules are too strict, they wont be able to compete with unregulated bookmakers.Advertising is this key and thats what jurisdictions really have to understand when they regulate [sports betting], is the extent to which they enable advertising, said Gainsbury, a faculty member of the University of Sydney and an editor for International Gambling Studies.An increase in problem gamblers?In the weeks leading up to the 2015 NFL season, U.S. daily fantasy sites DraftKings and FanDuel ran a television ad every 90 seconds. At the peak of the daily fantasy sports (DFS) advertising surge, they combined to air almost as many ads (1,285) as there are minutes in the day, according to iSpot.tv, which tracks advertising data. The CEOs of both companies recently signed settlements with the New York Attorney Generals Office, which found each company had targeted users with a propensity for gambling and addiction.Fagan, the former assistant U.S. attorney in Missouri, who successfully prosecuted offshore sports gambling website BetOnSports.com a decade ago, said the daily fantasy media explosion highlighted the concerns about any future with widespread legal sports betting.Expanded and heavily marketed sports gambling significantly shifts the focus of fans from the athletic contest to the pursuit of personal profit, Fagan told ESPN. Other non-wager-determinative aspects of sport wind up diminished. This means the increased viewership sought by greed-driven, short-sighted league and network executives will be driven to a marked degree by money fans, not sports fans who will have been converted, in whole or part, to money fans, and this will work a change in life in America.Only the gamblers, in the short term, and those profiting off their losses, in the long term, will see this change as a positive one.Other experts agree.Sam Skolnik, author of High Stakes: The Rising Cost of Americas Gambling Addiction, believes the only thing truly inevitable about the future of sports betting in the U.S. is that similar pitfalls to what Australia is experiencing will follow any expansion of legal sports betting.Voters, state legislators and other stakeholders should start thinking about the potential downsides of what would be a major expansion of legalized gambling, Skolnik said. Youre going to have this pool of new gamblers, and there is going to be a subset of problem gamblers. This is extremely painful for them and not just their families. Its for their employers, the whole communities that will pay the costs of increased gambling addiction.In the U.S., gambling addiction peaked at about 2.7 percent in the late 1990s and early 2000s, according to the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG). It has been on the decline ever since, even as gambling has expanded across the nation, and has now settled around 2 percent. At state-run problem gambling hotlines, calls from sports bettors are rare. In 2014, less than 1 percent of callers to the Nevadas gambling hotline identified sports betting as their most problematic form of gambling.In fact, the NCPG does not oppose the legalization of sports betting and will announce a resolution later this year that will lay out recommended safeguards for an expanded regulated market.Currently, U.S. sports bettors outside of Nevada and Delaware gamble in a massive unregulated market. They are often offered informal credit and are allowed to bet until they are up or down an agreed-upon amount, $1,000, for example. While convenient for bettors and bookies, credit betting is also dangerous.Keith Whyte, executive director of the NCPG, says unsecured credit betting puts people at risk for developing a gambling problem.The average problem gambler that seeks treatment has gambling debt twice their average annual income, Whyte said. The vast majority of that does not come from formal casino credit. Its either personal credit card or credit from a bookie, informal credit. [For problem gamblers], the substance abuse is money. If youre at risk for a gambling problem and youre betting on unsecured credit, if and when you start to lose, you can rapidly find yourself in severe problems.A shift in integrity of the game issuesAt a September gaming conference, four respected Las Vegas sportsbook directors were asked how many games in the past three years they had deemed suspicious enough to contact authorities.None, said Bob Scucci, a veteran bookmaker who ran the Stardust during its prime and is now in charge of all the Boyd Gaming sportsbooks in Nevada.The other three bookmakers nodded in agreement. If games are being fixed, no ones seeing it in Las Vegas. Nevertheless, nearly a century after the infamous Black Sock scandal of 1919, the negative link between gambling and game integrity remains the No. 1 concern for sports leagues.But does the current environment better protect the integrity of the games, when the bulk of the money bet on sports in the U.S. takes place in an unregulated market?Challenges to game integrity were cited repeatedly in the lead-up to Congress passing the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) in 1992. PASPA was designed to protect sports leagues from the perceived ills of sports betting spreading across the country.But that argument has now been somewhat flipped recently. As discussed in part 1 of this series, professional sports leagues are increasingly of the belief that a regulated sports betting market that allows wagers to be transparently tracked would help protect the integrity of their games, not hurt it.This is consistent with recent partnerships with big data companies by the professional sports leagues, representing a profound shift in the leagues position on line monitoring, the task of tracking gambling data in an attempt to identify unusual moves or unnatural money.The NFL, NBA and NHL have deals with Sportradar, a Switzerland-based conglomerate that is the parent company of Betradar, a major player in the global sports betting industry, and Major League Baseball has partnered with Genius Sports, a multi-faceted gambling data firm located in London. Even the NCAA has a commercial affiliation with Sportradar, with the Pac-12 conference using the services of CG Analytics, a subsidiary of a prominent Nevada sportsbook.The issue of sports integrity is something that always comes up, said Michelle Minton, consumer policy specialist who has opined on sports betting legalization as part of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a Libertarian think tank. The argument is if we legalize sports gambling, the games will be rigged, people will be taking dives, et cetera. I think thats a red herring argument. I would make the argument that its less likely to cause match-fixing.Legalization wont, however, eliminate attempts to compromise games for gambling purposes. There will be gambling scandals in the future; the hope is that maybe theyll be detected sooner.Its big money, Minton said of the American sports betting market. Anywhere theres big money there [are] going to be scandals. In the financial industry, there [are] always scandals. Im not sure why with gambling, its always considered such a landmark case every time a player or handful of players do something wrong. Theyre just people, and people do things wrong all the time in every industry.Tennis, which is second only to soccer in terms of global betting interest, has dealt with significant match-fixing issues, raising red flags for experts.Who exactly is supposed to be responsible for such oversight and policing? Michael Mewshaw, an industry expert and the author of several books, questioned. As we see in the NFL, its had no end of trouble simply enforcing the rule about properly inflated footballs.Setting the stage for the inevitableWhether in three years, five or a full decade, the normalization process that leads America down a path toward nationwide regulated sports betting is expected to be complete. With it, passive fans rooting for a favorite team or player will increasingly be replaced by active sports consumers with a financial stake in the action. Technological changes, evolving societal views and increased media coverage have contributed to wider acceptance of sports betting.Over the course of ESPNs four-month inquiry, the inference from the evidence was clear: The vast majority of the key stakeholders -- operators, bettors, broadcasters, advertisers and sports leagues -- are positioning themselves for Adam Silvers inevitable arrival of expanded legalized sports betting. Indeed, in 2013, the NCAA, NBA, NFL, NHL and Major League Baseball filed a crystal ball-worthy document in the New Jersey litigation and argued that they have an essential interest in how their games are perceived and the degree to which their sporting events become betting events.Certain law enforcement officials are on board, too.The current U.S. approach to sports betting is not working, wrote a five-person panel of former federal and state law enforcement officers in a 15-page report released by the American Gaming Association last month. An open, transparent, regulated sports betting market boosts law enforcement oversight.Such conclusions stand in sharp contrast to statements like those made by former U.S. Senator and New York Knicks player Bill Bradley, the chief supporter of PASPA during Congressional hearings in 1991.Athletes are not roulette chips, but sports gambling treats them as such, wrote Bradley in a 1992 academic article. If the dangers of state sponsored sports betting are not confronted, the character of sports and youngsters view of them could be seriously threatened.Now, NBA players, led by their union, are looking at sports betting legalization as a commercial opportunity.Were all on the same page as Adam [Silver] and the NBA, Jordan Schlachter, chief marketing officer at the National Basketball Players Association, told ESPN during the summer. Its an opportunity to grow the game. Its an opportunity to grow the exposure of our players. Were in the business of supporting our players and looking out for their best interest.Sen. Bradleys position has now been turned on its head, with the dangers of massive unregulated American sports betting market a focus now more than ever.PASPA turns 24 years old on Oct. 28. Most experts dont see the federal ban on nationwide sports betting celebrating its 30th. The next few years will reveal what the epitath on PASPAs tombstone will say and whats in store for the future of sports betting in America. Stitched Washington Redskins Jerseys . Its an influence in football and a big part of the game. Art Monk Jersey . Darren Helm scored on Detroits sixth attempt in the shootout and then Jonas Gustavsson stopped Andrew Shaws shot, lifting the Detroit Red Wings to a 5-4 win over the Chicago Blackhawks on Wednesday night. http://www.cheapredskinsjerseysonline.co...y-jersey-online . -- Charline Labonte couldnt have asked for a better homecoming.Steve Bruce continued his unbeaten run with Aston Villa, but they were held to a 1-1 draw by Brighton at the Amex in the Sky Bet Championship. Nathan Baker headed Villa in front after 20 minutes on Friday night before the Seagulls pulled level through a fine Glenn Murray effort on the stroke of half-time.Brighton may have dominated possession on the night, but it was Villa who had the of the better chances. Unfortunately for the away fans, though, they could not find another breakthrough and Bruce added a third draw to his three wins from six games in charge. Baker (left) scored with a header after 20 minutes Brighton, meanwhile, closed the gap on league leaders Newcastle, but the Magpies could extend the gap to five points when they play away at Leeds on Sunday, live on Sky Sports. Brighton started the better of the two sides, but it was Villa who opened the scoring thanks to Bakers header with the first real chance of the game after 20 minutes.Villa had not really got forward until they won a free-kick 35 yards out, and Albert Adomahs floated ball in found the head of Baker, who rose highest in the area to glance the ball past David Stockdale. Glenn Murray equalised from the edge of the area The home side continued to push forward but struggled to get their front two of Murray and Sam Baldock into the game until the 44th minute when the pair combined to devastating effect.First, Murray received the ball from Steve Sidwell then played a lovely one-two with Baldock before firing into the bottom corner with a fierce low strike from the edge of the area for his 150th league goal. The second half started at breakneck pace as both sides pushed for the next goal, and it was Murray who went closest just after the hour, heading narrowly over the bar for Brighton after Baldock had lifted the ball into his path.Villa boss Bruce threw on Jack Grealish midway through the second half and the young midfielder made an immediate impact as his quality on the ball helped the away side to dominate. Shane Duffy is challenged by Gabriel Agbonlahor In a period of pressure, Grealish saw two shots from the edge of the areaa deflected narrowly wide, while Jonathan Kodjia rattled the crossbar with one header before forcing a fine fingertip save from David Stockdale with another. Maurice Harris Jersey. Brighton substitute Jamie Murphy then forced a fine save from Pierluigi Gollini late on, but it was Villa who always looked the more likely to score again.Chris Hughtons side held on, though, and Villa missed their chance to climb into the top half of the table, sitting in 13th ahead of the rest of the weekends action. Brighton manager Chris Hughton claims he was happy to claim a draw against Aston Villa given the quality that Steve Bruces side possesses Brighton boss Chris Hughton:I thought we were very unfortunate to go 1-0 down when we did. We were up against a side that were very compact and pressed the ball, but didnt really have a goal threat in that first half period [before they scored]. It was very against the run of play.But as the game grew on they showed their quality and it probably got to the stage at 1-1 where I was reasonably happy with a draw. Theyre a very good side and have players who have come in for big fees to play in the Premier League, thats what we were up against.They showed what a big threat they are and why theyll be there or thereabouts at the end of the season.Aston Villa boss Steve Bruce:Its the best weve played in the second half because to come here is never going to be easy, [Brighton] are a very good side who have been playing very, very well.Were a bit disappointed we didnt see it out until half-time, but the way we responded in the second half, I can only congratulate them on a really good performance. With a little bit more luck maybe we could have gone away with all three.Weve worked meticulously on the shape and organisation, and with the flair players weve got were always likely to score a goal, and touch wood at the moment its going okay.Upgrade to Sky Sports now to watch Man Utd v Arsenal this Saturday and get the first six months half price! Cheap Adidas Hockey Jerseys Wholesale College Jerseys Cheap Nike Basketball Jerseys Cheap Football Jerseys Free Shipping Cheap Baseball Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Free Shipping Cheap Jerseys From China Wholesale Nike NFL Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys China Wholesale Nike NBA Jerseys Cheap NHL Jerseys Authentic Cheap MLB Jerseys Authentic Wholesale Soccer Jerseys China Cheap NCAA Jerseys China Stitched NFL Jerseys Cheap Custom Jerseys China Cheap Basketball Jerseys Authentic NFL Jerseys China Cheap College Jerseys Wholesale Football Jerseys ' ' '